The argument part 4

October 7, 2022

image/svg+xml So, might Iask again, why areyou here? I'm here because aspontaneous high-risk politicalargument broke out and thesematters fall under my jurisdiction.It's quite a complex operation,I assure you. Why, exactly, do weneed you to do anything atall? I think me and Seymour aremore than competent. Soon the press will bearriving from the Public Sideof the NRA. We need to replace yourfriends with actors so they don'taccidentally spout validopinions on camera. See, we need some peopleon-site to distract from the senselessviolence by talking about how it wastheir "first amendment right" andthat if they had guns it wouldn'thave happened. At the same time, thoseinvolved can be debriefed onthe dangers of public argumentsand valid opinions and releasedback to their homes. Excuse me! I find thata base violation of fact! Howcan that be the first amendmentright? And if they had guns, they'dboth be dead! This is stupid! Slap My skill indistraction betrays meonce again.

I guess I'd better start working on a halloween animation, huh?

Comments

Post a comment:
Username (always anonymous!):
Content: